Why did the DNC and Pelosi send TWO certification documents?

The following are documents obtained by the Canada Free Press and are authentic. They contain House Speaker's verified signature. I wonder why the Democrat National Committee submitted TWO certifications for Obama's nomination? I wonder why the TWO documents are almost similar, but differ in one critical phrase? These docs and the article is thanks to the Canada Free Press. Yes, Canadian.

Document Number One, the first one submitted:

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”


















Document Number Two, on file at DNC and the one sent to the states:

“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:



















The text certifying that Barack Hussein Obama was “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution” had been removed from the document sent to the states.

Fact don't lie people.